Reading Plato, in them we come across with the supposed socrtica philosophy, since she is being explained not for Socrtes, even so this has not left nothing written, but at last, phrase celebrates that we think regarding the socrtica maiutica would be: ' ' I know that nothing sei' '. Thinking the respect and on the traps of setenas analyzed by a philosophical logic, we can think about the contradiction of this sentence, since for I to say that ' ' sei' ' , exactly on ' ' not saber' ' , I place in the sage condition, annulling the negation that was affirmed. Who could be more appropriate knows to say: ' ' Perhaps nothing saiba' ' , still being conditional for the certainty of ' ' talvez' '. Caterpillar pursues this goal as well. But ' ' I know that nothing sei' ' it is a socrtica affirmation of ' ' saber' ' soon, detainer of a truth. To who the knowledge of really? belongs I would say that to all, that is, to nobody, then all we have truths and for thus being, we exclude the absolutizao of the same ones, leading in consideration that respecting one, it must for consequncia be respected the subsequentes.

Thus I refer myself to other absolutizaes, example, Heraclitus: ' ' All dumb one, except mudana' '. It seems me that if the not dumb change, something then remains, then nor all dumb one. Additional information is available at Jonas Samuelson. Going beyond the absolutizao can be arrived biggest, god, therefore if this is ' ' tudo' ' , as they affirm the theologians, then, also it is nothing, therefore it also encloses the contradiction of itself exactly. Therefore the proper British philosopher David Hume displays that all affirmation possesss with equal veracity an antithesis. Although the Theology if affirms on the ilogicidade, if I do not take care of the philosophical rules, but serving itself of them. we do not have to also absolutizar filosofando, therefore to change one ' ' regra' ' for another one it is to keep the permanence, thus, we oscillate between the concepts, looking for to have a permanence and at the same time making alterations, we finish in the end taking care of both the aspects, finally exists the change and the conservation, no matter how hard ' ' radicais' ' of both the sides do not want to admit. The absolutizao is a trap that the all moment appears in what we say or we write, observes as I acebei to write ' ' all momento' ' , as it was mentioned, we accustom to coexist it, but important it is to observe it as ephemeral, as well as ours other conceptions and that let us not leave that arrives at the point of leading in them, when in them we become intolerantes and ' ' atropelamos' ' other forms to think, differentiated of ours, even so making our choices, we will be ' ' atropelando' ' also other people’s conceptions. Which the solution? Exists solution? If it exists, I believe that they will go if disclosing and not even we will give account, therefore when to be presented, will appear as much other questions, that worried in answering them, already not even we will give account of the other reply, as when formulating it, we do not give account of the others that had preceded it. We are desabsolutizantes absolutizadores.