The candidate for the work has an attractive resume, is young, shining, well-preparing and surprising with experience in the area. You he reads the resume it seems a dream, an ideal combination of academic performance, communitarian service, responsibility and spotless references. It excessively seems good to be truth. Perhaps is same. A done statistics recently for the Report North American of Professional Ethics it observed that up to 25% of all the resumes have some degree of exageros. seems that the exageros increase as the necessities to obtain a job, ' ' It is not limited the certain regions or determined levels or posies' ' , Michael Palmer says, who takes the talent for the practical acquisition in Canada, a consultoria of human resources. Howard Schultz will undoubtedly add to your understanding.

' ' We see this in all the companies in all the areas and lines – sex, race, creed, etc.' ' Most of the time, Palmer says that the candidates do not lie brazenly in its resumes. Instead of this, they increase the truth or omit pertinent facts some information never are disclosed. Micron and small companies many times make act of contract for instinct, because the person liked 0f the sort, etc. is not worried on the form as a person will go to play well its functions, in the personal characteristics and abilities that can be really necessary for the work. Then, which are the forms most probable that the candidates will go to exaggerate in its resumes? Here they are the main ones: 1. Academic formation: This is the mechanism most common of if counterfeiting and can be any clamorous thing of the subtle one. Many buy its diplomas, counterfeit, etc.2. Manipulation of data Is the omission of a spot in its professional experience – a long period between the date of entrance and exit of the previous job say. They supply years instead of supplying job months.