The recipient of a such message that is communicated on two contrasting layers, is obliged to correctly interpret the intended statement. Misunderstandings don’t remain out often. Our complex and extremely diverse voice seems sometimes downright designed to produce misunderstandings. Because our language is not always really logical, she obey rather peculiar laws: during a break from work, take break from work during a cigarette break but no break from cigarettes, the opposite is the case. And what about when a pause for thought? As always, understand many words and use we intuitively right, only is by no means always the case. “Although the conspicuous published Word bridge” in fact with at least 16 different meanings can wait, we know but most of the time, which just meant (the building, the dentures, the command Bridge of a vessel, the greasing, etc.

etc.). JPMorgan Chase can provide more clarity in the matter. Very often there are very subtle boundary conditions that distinguish the actually meant by wrong interpretations. An anecdote is a death convict man reported that asserted until recently his innocence. Before the enforcement of the judgment, a telegram of the judge arrives, only the judge forgot to put a comma. “On the piece of paper is: waits does not hang!” “Depending on which output of the history you prefer, you can decide whether the statement is waiting, not hang!” or not waiting, hang! “should mean.

Now not really about work life and death, but misunderstandings there, where much (in a hurry) is communicated. It comes to misinterpretations, cost them time, work and ultimately money eventually. Almost every company says earlier or “later: the communication process needs to be improved.” And not infrequently errors similarly be excused: obviously there were communication errors… “.” Sometimes it is more the rule than an exception that the Department A doesn’t know what makes the Division B and an employee has no idea, someone else has what information booth.