We believe that the work and the persistence, in some way, always they are rewarded. It is important to have personal satisfaction, money is not everything. Money can bring comfort, but never it will bring happiness. We see this when comparing two personages of history: Hawk and the father of Ana. Hawk was simple, it did not suffer exactly with the apparent difficulties and if it amused with little thing. More info: fuel tanks.

The father of Ana, in turn, even so very rich, did not obtain to demonstrate affection, did not use to advantage the best things of the life, suffered with the fear to want to possess itself of its wealth, believed that he was being followed, had fear of being deceased, had a vision limited to the economic power of the people and thought that the approach of any strange person sketched an implicit interest for its money. Thus we question: who suffered more? The beggar? Or the Banker? Evidently, we do not have so to be gone astray the point of not being worried in nothing about the future, but yes not to suffer demasiadamente with the future. At last, the lies are several that the book ' ' The future of humanidade' ' in the ones of. Such lies can be applied in the most diverse fields of the life. We have that to have the conscience that the life is uncertain, but that we are not predestined the nothing, in my opinion this is even though implicit when Marcopolo explains its theory for Hawk and argues that Hittler not necessarily was born to be a dictator that wanted to exterminar Jewish, this could have been artist or painter case its life had been influenced in other ways. The way where we are born in them influences, but it does not determine who we will be. The quality and happiness in the life, as well as the success in the professional life depend on the persistence, of the disposal to learn, questioning, of searching, of the respect to the next one who is this will be and also of the sensitivity, that is one of the inherent qualities to the man and diferenciadora of the excessively animal ones. To want to please to all is an utopia, but from the moment that we respect the next one, either in the way of we treat as it simply or in relation to its space, the convivncia becomes more bearable and pleasant.